Dismissed
Vanita Devidas Devshette v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/5522/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition declared infructuous and disposed of without elaboration.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
W.P. No. /2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5522 OF 2012
Vanita Devidas Devshette
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr S.R. Choukidar, Advocate for the petitioner; Mrs M.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent no.1; Mr V.S. Panpatte, Advocate for respondent no.2; Mr B.L. Sagar, Advocate for respondent no.3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. DATE : 17th December, 2013
PER COURT:
Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. It is submitted by the
petitioner that the petition is rendered infructuous.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE), JUDGE
amj/wp5522.12
Vanita Devidas Devshette
The State of Mah.
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court