The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition abated due to the death of the petitioner, noting the legal heirs are not inclined to pursue the cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No. /2013
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5323 OF 2012
Tulshiram Ganpati Jadhav
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
Sayed Mohammadali Sayed Gafoorali & anr.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr S.S. Bora, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr S.S. Kazi, Advocate for respondent nos.1 & 2
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. DATE : 17th December, 2013
PER COURT:
Heard the learned Advocates for the respective sides.
petitioner has passed away and according to his instructions as of today, the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner are not inclined to pursue the cause of action. In this view of the matter, the petition is disposed of as being abated.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE), JUDGE
amj/wp5323.12
Tulshiram Ganpati Jadhav
Sayed Mohammadali Sayed Gafoorali
Respondent no. 2
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
