Petitions allowed to be withdrawn conditionally on the respondents providing a specific police order within 24 days. The High Court dismissed the writ petitions as withdrawn with liberty.
Petitions allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.543 OF 2012
Mohammed Assif Rasul
..Petitioner.
Versus
Dilip Waghmare and Another ..Respondents.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.544 OF 2012
Shahid Amaan Shaikh ..Petitioner.
Versus
Dilip Waghmare and Another
..Respondents.
Mr.Subhash Jha with Mr.Rishabh H. Vakharia for the petitioners in both the petitions.
Mr.J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State in both the petitions.
CORAM : S.C. Dharmadhikari & G.S. Patel, JJ.
DATE : 23rd September 2013
P.C. :
24th September 2013, the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Wadala Division
will provide a copy of the order dated 10th February 2012, details of which
1 of 2
are disclosed in the affidavit of the concerned Assistant Commissioner of Police and the Special Executive Magistrate, Wadala Division, Mumbai filed in these petitions on 9th March 2012. Mr.Jha, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the petitioner will collect the copy of the order handed over to Mr.Jha or his junior, as directed above.
2 of 2
Mohammed Assif Rasul
Shahid Amaan Shaikh
Dilip Waghmare
S.C. Dharmadhikari
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
