The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed five consolidated criminal writ petitions as the original complaint petitions had been withdrawn by the complainant, rendering nothing to survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp50-07grp.sxw
1/1
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.50 OF 2007 @ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.51 OF 2007 @ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.52 OF 2007 @ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.53 OF 2007 @ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.54 OF 2007 @ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.55 OF 2007 @ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.56 OF 2007
Shailendra Singh …Petitioner
versus
1.State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Shashi K.Jain, for Petitioner.
Mr.A.R.Patil, APP for Respondent no.1.
Mr.Rakesh L.Singh i/b. M/s.M.V.Kini & Co., for Respondent no.2.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 29th July, 2013
P.C. :
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for writ petitioner.
complaint petitions are withdrawn by the learned Counsel for complainant. The Government of India Resolution to this effect is tendered. Nothing survives in the writ petitions. At the request of learned Counsel, the writ petitions are permitted to be withdrawn. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)
Shailendra Singh
State of Maharashtra
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
