This court dismissed Criminal Application No. 43 of 2010 for default regarding non-service of notices to two respondents and dismissed Criminal Application No. 44 of 2010 for failure to supply necessary copies, rendering notices unissued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appln43-44-10.sxw
1/1
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.43 OF 2010
1.Santosh Tiwari & Anr. …Applicants versus 1.State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2010
1.Zee News Ltd. & Ors. ...Applicants. Versus 1.State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Applicants.
Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP for State-Respondent no.1.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 29th July, 2013 ---
P.C. :
In application no.43 of 2010, the learned Counsel has not taken steps for respondent nos.3 and 4 inspite of report that they are not residing at given address. Consequently, the application is dismissed qua respondent nos.3 and 4.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)
Santosh Tiwari & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Zee News Ltd. & Ors.
K.U.Chandiwali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
