The writ petition filed by Nitendrasingh @ Nitin Kumarsingh Patil for withdrawal with liberty to file two separate petitions was allowed and the petition was disposed of.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file two separate petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(WP 4736 of 2013)
VAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No.4736 OF 2013
Nitendrasingh @ Nitin Kumarsingh Patil ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Ms.Jyoti Chavan for Petitioner Mr.Sameer Patil-AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 ***
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, AND Smt. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 11, 2013
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to
file two separate petitions since common petition cannot be filed in
respect of two separate causes of action. Writ petition is allowed to
be withdrawn with liberty as prayed and disposed of.
[Smt. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Nitendrasingh @ Nitin Kumarsingh Patil
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
R. P. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court