is conducted at the behest of the Respondents, no action is taken by the Inquiry Officer. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has relied upon various applications filed by him from time to time. It is submitted that though the Petitioner was admitted in the hospital and the Petitioner was asked for an adjournment, the adjournment was refused and he was informed that if the Petitioner does not remain present, the proceeding would proceed ex-parte. He, therefore, submitted that he would not get justice from the Inquiry Officer in view of the circumstances which were enumerated by the Petitioner in the petition and, therefore, prayed that the charge-sheet issued against him may be quashed and set aside. He also submitted that in the event the charge-sheet issued against the Petitioner is not set aside, an order may be passed, protecting the services of the Petitioner. He further submitted that the subsistence allowance of Rs.37,000/- is not an actual subsistence allowance which he is entitled to get as per the CDA rules.
