The single-judge High Court of Bombay allowed a criminal writ petition to be withdrawn and dismissed it with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.449.13.10
1
kps
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.449 OF 2013
Bharat Dattaram Amre.
..Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra and another. ..Respondents
Ms.Manjiri S. Parasnis, for the Petitioner. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the Respondent/State. Ms.Sheetal Kadam, for the Respondent No.2. Mr.R.S.Ghadge i/by Mr.A.S.Desai, for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE :- 12th April, 2013.
PC:
1 The Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is dismissed as such with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.
( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. )
Bharat Dattaram Amre
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
