Single judge held prior bail order unrecallable; refused revision liberty. Granted applicant liberty to apply afresh on fresh materials showing no apprehension of absconding. Criminal Application dismissed.
Liberty granted to apply for bail afresh. Criminal Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 appp.212.13.ba.191.13.905
kps
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.212 OF 2013 IN
BAIL APPLICATION NO.191 OF 2013
Jagdish @ Surya Kaliram Joshi. ..Applicant - Versus - The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent
Mr.K.M.Mhatre, for the Applicant. Ms.G.P.Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent/State.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE :- 12th April, 2013.
PC:
1 The earlier order passed on the Bail Application cannot be recalled and particularly as suggested and requested by the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. Nothing prevents the Applicant from applying for bail afresh and pointing out such material as is available to show that there is no apprehension that the Applicant will abscond and will not be available for trial. Granting such liberty, this Criminal Application is dismissed.
( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the earlier order passed on the Bail Application can be recalled.
Jagdish @ Surya Kaliram Joshi
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
