Pathan Ilyas Khan Jumma Khan v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.40 OF 2013 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 41/2013, WITH 42/2013 WITH 43/2013 WITH 80/2013, WITH 44/2013 WITH 53/2013 WITH 54/2013 WITH 55/2013, WITH 56/2013 WITH 79/2013 WITH R.A.NOS.102/2013 TO 105/2013, 107/2013 TO 113 OF 2013
( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
DATE : 12/09/2014
PER COURT :
- By oral judgment dated 22/01/2013, this Court had directed
the Trial Court to decide the matters within 6 (six) months.
- By an order dated 28/08/2013, time was extended by 9 months. Second extension of 9 months is requested.
- In the light of the above, time is extended only by 6 (six) months. Litigating parties shall co-operate with the Trial Court. The Trial Court may reject adjournment applications, if found to have been filed on an unreasonable cause.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Coram
RAVINDRA V GHUGE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court