Syed Manzoor Ali Syed Khurshid Ali v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.40 OF 2013 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 41/2013, WITH 42/2013 WITH 43/2013 WITH 80/2013, WITH 44/2013 WITH 53/2013 WITH 54/2013 WITH 55/2013, WITH 56/2013 WITH 79/2013 WITH R.A.NOS.102/2013 TO 105/2013, 107/2013 TO 113 OF 2013
( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
DATE : 12/09/2014
PER COURT :
- By oral judgment dated 22/01/2013, this Court had directed
the Trial Court to decide the matters within 6 (six) months.
- By an order dated 28/08/2013, time was extended by 9 months. Second extension of 9 months is requested.
- In the light of the above, time is extended only by 6 (six) months. Litigating parties shall co-operate with the Trial Court. The Trial Court may reject adjournment applications, if found to have been filed on an unreasonable cause.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the game of oscillation by granting extensions of another below/. 2./3 grounds exists in the resent request for extension of time to the Trial Court for resc. 4.2.1 for. 2013. 2013.
Whether the game of oscillation by granting extensions of another below/. 2./3 grounds exists in the resent request for extension of time to the Trial Court for resc. 4.2.1 for. 2013. 2013.
Whether the game of oscillation by granting extensions of another below/. 2./3 grounds exists in the resent request for extension of time to the Trial Court for resc. 4.2.1 for. 2013. 2013.
Coram
RAVINDRA V GHUGE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court