The petitioner challenged an order of the Cooperative Court refusing to produce a list of bank members granted a loan waiver scheme. The High Court found no perversity in the refusal until the petitioner proved his own entitlement and held no interference warranted.
The Writ Petition was rejected. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP3593-13.sxw
JP CHAVAN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3593 OF 2013
Sitaram Gopal Patil ... Petitioner Versus Rendal Sahakari Bank and others ... Respondents
Mr. G. M. Savagave, for the petitioner
CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 20 JUNE 2013
P.C .
1/2
WP3593-13.sxw
sought for by the petitioner, except the list of the members who were given benefit of loan waiver scheme, by the impugned order dated 2 January 2013. Inspite of this direction, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 2 January 2013.
(N. M. JAMDAR, J.)
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Cooperative Court order refusing production of the list of members granted loan waiver scheme pending a proof of eligibility.
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Cooperative Court order granting production of other loan documents.
Sitaram Gopal Patil
Rendal Sahakari Bank
N. M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
