High Court at Aurangabad dismissed two Criminal Writ Petitions seeking quashing of a police complaint. The court held no interference was warranted based on the explicit allegations in the complaint. Rule was discharged.
Petitions dismissed; rule discharged; ad-interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
332.06 CWP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 332 OF 2006
Digambar Bhillu Chavan
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
RESPONDENTS
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 384 OF 2006
Nagnath Namdeo Nagme & othes
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
RESPONDENTS
Shri K.S. Bhore, Advocate for petitioners in both petitions Shri D.V. Tele, A.P.P. for respondent / State in both petitions
CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : 8th February, 2013.
PER COURT :
2
332.06 CWP
( U.D. SALVI, J. )
SDM* Feb-2013.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ jurisdiction should be exercised to quash the police complaint.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Digambar Bhillu Chavan
Nagnath Namdeo Nagme
The State of Maharashtra
U.D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
