The High Court of Judicature of Bombay allowed an application seeking condonation of a 314-day delay in presenting an appeal, finding the application merited allowance and disposing of the civil application accordingly.
Condonation of delay of 314 days in presenting the appeal allowed; civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders.
901 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 450 OF 2009
,In FAST/24363/2001
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS
BHAGIRATHIBA KONDIBA KALE & ANR.
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. K. S. Patil
CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. Dated: February 27, 2013 ...
PER COURT :
( R.M. BORDE, J. )
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 314 days in presenting the appeal merits condonation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Bhagirathiba Kondiba Kale
R.M. Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
