petitioner approached High Court challenging dismissal of complaint on jurisdictional grounds. Bench declined merits but disposed petition allowing alternate remedy.
Liberty granted to petitioner to avail alternate remedy of appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3304 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
andRegistrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.S.R.Bharad, advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.
Date : 18.04.2013.
PER COURT :
2
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.18.04.2013. asp/office/wp3304.13
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ jurisdiction can be entertained despite availability of alternate remedy of appeal.
Petitioner
Respondent
S.V.Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court