The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed against the Trial Court's rejection of the petitioners' application for explanation regarding the 20-year delay in filing the Written Statement, finding no case for interference.
none
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-3262.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3262 OF 2013
Kisan Tatyaso Ghadage and anr. : Petitioners. Versus Balasaheb Sambhajirao Ingale and ors. : Respondents.
Mr. Kirankumar Phakade for the Petitioners.
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 24th April 2013
P.C.
1 There is a delay of 20 years 4 months and 14 days in filing the Written Statement. The reasons mentioned by the Petitioners in the application were not found to be acceptable by the Trial Court.
2 In my view, no case for interference is made out. The above Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed.
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
1 of 1
lgc
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner was entitled to interfere with the Trial Court's refusal to accept the reasons for delay in filing the Written Statement.
Whether any case is made out for interference in the writ petition despite the 20-year delay in filing the Written Statement.
Kisan Tatyaso Ghadage and anr.
Balasaheb Sambhajirao Ingale and ors.
R. M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
