Dismissed
Smt Poonam W/O Omprakash Bajaj and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Dhantoli Nagpur and Another
Bombay HCWP/302/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1502wp302.12
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.302 OF 2012
(Poonam Omprakash Bajaj and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri F. Mirza, Advocate for petitioners. Smt. B.H. Dangre, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents.
---------- CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 15, 2013
Smt. Dangre, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents, submits that possession of the premises in question would be given to the petitioners on 16/2/2013 upto 6 p.m. Her statement is accepted.
In view of the above, cause of action in the present criminal writ petition except as to the claim for compensation does not survive. Insofar as claim for compensation is concerned, the petitioners
are granted liberty to file appropriate proceedings as
1502wp302.12
2/2
may be available in law. The criminal writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Poonam Omprakash Bajaj and others
The State of Maharashtra and another
A.P. Lavande
A.B. Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court