The court disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a direction to decide a representation. The court directed the respondent to dispose of the representation on merits within eight weeks.
Direction to respondent to decide representation on merits within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP. 2773-13
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 2773 OF 2013
Popat Dattu Shinde ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. D. W. Bhosale, for the Petitioner. Mr. Sameer Patil, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE & Smt. R. P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 17, 2013.
P.C.
Vinayak Halemath
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Popat Dattu Shinde
State of Maharashtra
Other Respondents
SubDivisional Officer Pandharpur
V. M. Kanade
R. P. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
