The court noted the respondent's compliance with a previous order regarding maintenance payment. It deferred the claim for enhancement of maintenance to the final hearing of the linked Family Court Appeal, which was expedited. The civil application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAM-15-13.sxw
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15 OF 2013 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.108 OF 2006
ALONG WITH
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.108 OF 2006
Swati Savla … Applicant/Appellant Versus Yatin Savla … Respondent
Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal for the Applicant/Appellant.
Mrs. Prabha Badadare for the Respondent.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.J.
DATE : 13TH JUNE, 2013.
P.C.:
1/2
CAM-15-13.sxw
that claim shall be taken into consideration at the time of final hearing of the Family Court Appeal.
[Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.] [V.M. Kanade, J.]
2/2
Swati Savla
Yatin Savla
Kaname V.M.
SondurBaldota R.P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
