Criminal Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners who intended to pursue alternate legal remedies under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. or a private complaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cri-wp-265-13
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 265 OF 2013
Mr. Kiran Uttamrao Hole and anr. Vs.
The State Govt. of Maharashtra and ors.
.. Petitioners
.. Respondents
Mr. Vasant Adsul for petitioners. Mrs. A. S. Pai, APP for State.
CORAM: P. V. HARDAS &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
APRIL 16, 2013.
P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states on instructions that
the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition as the petitioners
intend to avail the alternate remedies available to the petitioners in law i.e. either filing of private complaint or an application under Section 156(3) of Cr. P. C.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no
order as to costs.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (P. V. HARDAS,J.)
Mr. Kiran Uttamrao Hole and anr.
The State Govt. of Maharashtra and ors.
P. V. Hardas
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
