Criminal Writ Petition dismissed for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance after the petition was restored to file following an earlier default order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp18.13
1
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.18 OF 2013
Prijesh Arunkumar Kurari V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
)....Petitioner
)....Respondent
None for the petitioner.
Mr.Anand Mishra i/by Mr.A.M.Saraogi for Original complainant. Mrs.A.S.Pai APP for State.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 15 th April, 2013.
PC :-
1 By our order dated 1st April 2013 we have recorded that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner though the petition was called out twice. As a last chance, petition was adjourned for today. Today also, none appears for the petitioner.
2 It seems that this petition was dismissed for default earlier and by order dated 25.2.2013 the order dismissing the petition by default was recalled and petition was restored to file. Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner when the petition was called out for hearing, petition is dismissed for default.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(P.V.HARDAS,J)
2 wp18.13
Prijesh Arunkumar Kurari
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.HARDAS
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
