The High Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the same, vacating any interim orders. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted. Petition disposed of. Interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 2468-12
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 2468 OF 2012
Souvenir Developers (I) Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Sachin Punde, for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Chavan i/b R. J. Nathani, for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Vijay Patil, for Respondent No. 4. Ms. Megha i/b J. Shekhar, for Respondent No. 6.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 10, 2013
PC.
. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, upon instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is accordingly disposed of. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Souvenir Developers (I) Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Others
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
