Petitioner and respondent settled disputes amicably. Court disposed of writ petition based on signed Consent Terms filed in court.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-wp-211-2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.211 OF 2013
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai Versus Uttam Shankar Chavan
....Petitioner.
...Respondent.
Mr. P.M.Palshikar i/by M.V.Kini & Co. advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. U.S.Kamkekar, Asstt. Personal Manager of Petitioner present. Mr. S.L.Chowdhary, adv. For respondent. Mr. Uttam Shankar Chavan respondent present-in-person.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J.
DATED : April 8, 2013.
P.C.:
Parties to the petition, have settled their disputes amicably and have filed Consent Terms. Consent Terms are signed by the Assistant Personnel Manager on behalf of the petitioner and by respondent along with their respective counsel. Both Assistant Personnel Manager of the petitioner and respondent, are present in the Court. On specific query, they state that they have gone through the contents of the Consent Terms and have no objection to dispose of the writ petition in terms of the Consent Terms. Consent Terms are accordingly taken on record and
marked Ex.'X' for Identification .
Shivgan
6-wp-211-2013
2
2 Petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the
Consent Terms.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Shivgan
Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai
Uttam Shankar Chavan
RANJIT MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
