decree has been put in execution and when there is an obstructionists notice which was made absolute, after 19 years from the date of the finalization of the decree, namely, by virtue of the final orders in this execution proceedings passed in the obstructionists notice dated 5th December, 1992, and, therefore, proceedings are time barred. This is on account of an objection which was raised on an affidavit filed by the present Respondent, namely, Sunita Vitthal Surve on 30th July, 2011. To my mind, the affidavit was more like a substantive application for recalling the order of issuance of warrant of possession. Now in such an application which was equally a response to what the Constituted Attorney of the decree holders placed on record, all such contentions as were sought to be raised and for the first time have been raised, the Court below lost sight of the fact that these were resisted by the Petitioners by filing an Affidavit-in-Reply and all throughout their case is that a decree passed in the year 1972 has been obstructed and resisted by the proceedings which are totally frivolous and vexatious. Every time warrant of possession was issued, attempts have been made to avoid handing over possession and, equally, the physical possession could not obtained by the necessary force. All such affidavits being on
