The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad allowed withdrawal of Criminal Writ Petition No. 1 of 2013 and dismissed it as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal under Section 341 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
25 wp.1.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1 OF 2013
PAWAN PARASRAM GAIKWAD
VERSUS
BAPURAO NARAYAN KARANJKAR
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi. Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.A. Kulkarni.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 20th September, 2013.
P.C.:
2 Since an appeal is provided for, against the impugned order, the learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition stating that the Petitioner would file an appeal as contemplated under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3 The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and the same stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to file an appeal under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[ ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. ]
ndm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal writ petition should be allowed to be withdrawn upon the petitioner's undertaking to file an appeal under Section 341 of the CrPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
PAWAN PARASRAM GAIKWAD
BAPURAO NARAYAN KARANJKAR
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
