The High Court at Aurangabad heard a criminal application and allowed it in terms of a specific prayer clause, disposing of the matter and listing a related case for final hearing.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (C). Application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
41 appln.1012.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1012 OF 2012
IN APPLN/3655/2009
SOU. MAYA SUBHASH DILWALE
VERSUS
SUB DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, BEED AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D.S. Bharuka. APP for Respondent No.2: Mr. Kishor S.Patil.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 20th September, 2013.
P.C.:
. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (C).
ndm
[ ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. ]
Sou. Maya Subhash Dilwale
Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Beed
Another
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
