Vinod Ramesh Thorat v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal writ petition withdrawn by petitioner at hearing and dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
2-12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders.
MemorandaofCoram,
appearance,Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2012
VINOD RAMESH THORAT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vishnu B. Madan Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. Choudhari N. L.
APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. R. K. Ladda.
Advocate for Respondent2 : Mr. P. B. Patil.
***
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL AND A.I.S. CHEEMA,JJ. DATED: 10th SEPTEMBER,2013
PER COURT:
1. Heard.
On instructions, learned counsel
holding for Mr. Chaudhari, withdraws the
writ petition. Permitted.
2.Writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
[A.I.S.CHEEMA, J.] [K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.]
Dt.10/09/2013
ans/2-12
Vinod Ramesh Thorat
The State of Maharashtra
K. U. Chandiwala
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court