In a Criminal Writ Petition, the Court directed the Collector of Nandurbar to examine a representation alleging that a plot was wrongly allotted to an alleged adopted son of the petitioner's relative, and dispose of the petition if merit is found.
No notice; Collector directed to record representation and act accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp190.13
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 190 OF 2013
Laxman Hiralal Kadam ...Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
Mr. A.R. Kale h/f Mr. S.V. Natu, advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondent-State
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL AND A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED : 6th SEPTEMBER, 2013
PER COURT :-
rlj/
wp190.13
-2-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned Collector shall consider the representation regarding impugned allotment of a plot to a pseudo-adopted son.
Whether the Writ Petitioner is entitled to relief against the alleged malfeasance.
Laxman Hiralal Kadam
The State of Maharashtra
K. U. Chandiwala
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
