The High Court dismissed the applicant's criminal application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., holding that the FIR prima facie disclosed an offence against him.
The criminal application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran2226.11
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2226 OF 2011
Gulab Vinayak Mukane ...Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents
Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, advocate for the applicant Mr. B.V. Wagh, A.P.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL AND A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED : 6th SEPTEMBER, 2013
PER COURT :-
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. )
rlj/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain the criminal application despite the FIR appearing to disclose an offence against the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gulab Vinayak Mukane
The State of Maharashtra
K. U. Chandiwald
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
