The court disposed of Writ Petition no. 1836 of 2013 on its own filing as infructuous based on the counsel's submission that subsequent developments rendered the prayer meaningless.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 WP/1836/2013
Tapadia RR/B.52
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1836 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Shri Mohammed Iftikhar Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Lavkush Sharma i/by L.J.Law, Advocate for respondent no.1.
CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 12/09/2013
PC:
Heard Mr Mohammed Iftikhar Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Lavkush Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.1.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent developments, the prayer in this petition has become infructuous.
In view of this submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(R.G.KETKAR, J.)
Tapadia
B.52
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
