This order allowed the applicant's civil application to permit substitution of additional respondents and set aside abatement, condoning the delay in filing.
Civil Application allowed to permit substitution of additional respondents and set aside abatement, with amendment of the Review Petition within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 CAO/128/2013
Tapadia RR / B.50
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2013 IN
REVIEW/48/2008 IN WP/7349/2006
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.S.Kanetkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. N.V.Khaladkar,Advocate for respondent nos 2A to 2C.
CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 06/09/2013
PC:
2/2 CAO/128/2013
appearing for the parties and for the reasons stated in the application, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) with no order as to costs.
(R.G.KETKAR,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in the application for substituting additional respondents can be condoned and abatement set aside?
Applicant
Heirs and legal representatives of respondent no.2
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
