In a writ petition seeking removal of scrap shops causing a health hazard, the court directed petitioners to approach competent authorities within four weeks instead of granting immediate mandamus, disposing of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Writ Petition No. 1662 of 2008
Ashok s/o. Wamanrao Bankar, Age : 48 years, Occupation : President of Free Journalist Organization, Maharashtra, and Social Worker, R/o. Gautamnagar, Aurangabad, and another. .. Petitioners.
versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Public Health & Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, and 32 others. .. Respondents. .........................
Mr. D.G. Kamble, Advocate, holding for Mr. P.M. Gaikwad, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.
DATE : 26TH SEPTEMBER 2013
COURT'S ORDER (Per B.P. Dharmadhikari) :
(2)
old, this court has rejected adjournment and Adv. Mr. Kamble was asked to assist the court. Without prejudice to rights of the petitioners in the matter, Adv. Mr. Kamble has accordingly assisted the court. He submits that the prayer in the petition is to remove scrap shops from residential area because those shops are proving to be health hazard. Our attention has been drawn to notice issued by Grampanchayat on 29-12-2005.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ) ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE JUDGE
bgp/wp1662
Ashok s/o. Wamanrao Bankar
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
R. V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
