The Bench found that the writ petition challenging an appealable impugned order could not be entertained summarily. It dismissed the petitioner's writ petition, granting liberty to file a regular appeal against any resultant acquittal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 16 OF 2013
AMBAJOGAI PEOPLES COOP. BANK LTD
VERSUS
MANAV MULTI ALPASANKHYANKA WELFARE AND EDUCATION MAHILA MANDAL AND ORS.
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A.S. Doke h/f Mr. Salunke V.D. APP for Respondent No.3 : Mr. P.N. Muley
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Y.B. Bolkar h/f Mr.Bachate
Pralhad D.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
Dated: September 27, 2013
P. C. :
Heard.
( ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. )
sga
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this court can entertain a writ petition challenging an order that is specifically made appealable under law.
Ambajogai Peoples Coop. Bank Ltd
Manav Multi Alpasankhya Welf And Educ Mahila Mandal
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
