In Criminal Application No. 685 of 2012 under WP/336/2011, the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad held that since the underlying petition was withdrawn, the application did not survive, and interim relief was vacated.
Application disposed of as it does not survive the withdrawal of the underlying petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
902-appln.685.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 685 OF 2012
IN WP/336/2011
YAMUNABAI BHARAT THAKARE
VERSUS
DIPENDRASING M. KUSHWAH AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant: Mr. A.G. Magare.
APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. A.B.Girase, Advocate h/f Mr. D.S. Bagul. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. K.S.Patil.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 26th September, 2013.
P.C.:
. As the petition itself has been withdrawn, the application does not survive, inasmuch as the interim relief automatically gets vacated.
2 The application thus, stands disposed of.
[ ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. ]
ndm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal application survives given that the underlying petition has been withdrawn.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
YAMUNABAI BHARAT THAKARE
DIPENDRASING M. KUSHWAH AND ANOTHER
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
