The single judge, Surve (J.), granted the petitioner's application to withdraw and dispose of the writ petition. No substantive legal issue was adjudicated.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP1468-13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1468/2013
(AYUSHI @ DEEPSHIKHA DEEPAK MISHRA VERSUS KUMUDINI NARENDRA MISHRA)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri A.M. Kukday, counsel for the petitioner.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 29, 2013.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would take appropriate steps against the persons, who are sought to be joined in the civil suit filed by the petitioner. The petitioner is, therefore, not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
Permission is granted.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE
APTE
AYUSHI @ DEEPSHIKHA DEEPAK MISHRA
KUMUDINI NARENDRA MISHRA
VASANTI A. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
