Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a substantive petition challenging a specific section of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a substantive petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 1246.13.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1246 OF 2013
M/s. Lux Industries Limited.
... Petitioner.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
... Respondents.
Mr. Vashi i/b. Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Petitioner. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
APRIL 25, 2013.
P.C. :-
Mr. Vashi, learned Counsel for the Petitioner states on instructions that the Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty of filing a substantive Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for challenging the virus of Section 2(1) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 only.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Lux Industries Limited
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
Mrs. Mridula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
