Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR registered under sections 448, 452 read with section 34 of IPC based on Article 226 of the Constitution. The court allowed the petition as the dispute was amicably settled by the parties.
The First Information Report registered vide Crime No. 3/2013 was quashed and set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1122_2013
Vidya amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1122 OF 2013
Napoleon Sebastian Fernandez & Anr. … Petitioners vs.
Kiran Devappa Pujari & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr. Manish Jain for the petitioners. Mr. Kanchanpurkar for respondent no. 1. Mr. J.P. Yadnik, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 24th April, 2013.
P.C.
Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the
learned counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission.
amicably settled.
1 of 2
wp1122_2013
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the First Information Report can be quashed upon settlement of the dispute between the parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Napoleon Sebastian Fernandez & Anr.
Kiran Devappa Pujari & Anr.
P.V. Hardas
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
