Writ petition and criminal application were dismissed by the Bombay High Court as withdrawn by the petitioners, with liberty to avail legal remedies.
Writ petition and application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp523.13
1
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.523 OF 2013
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.102 OF 2013
Mr.Rajesh Thandiram Jain & Ors. )....Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. )....Respondents
Mr.S.V.Kotwal along with Hrishikesh Mundargi for the petitioners.
Mr.Anand Mishra i/by A.M.Saraogi for the applicant. Mrs.P.H.Kantharia APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 22nd April, 2013.
PC :-
1 Learned Counsel Mr.Kotwal representing the petitioners after arguing for sometime states on instructions from the petitioners that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail the remedies available to the petitioners in law. We accordingly dismiss this writ petition as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.
wp523.13
2
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.102 OF 2013
1 Since the petitioners have withdrawn the petition, Mr.Saraogi learned counsel for the applicant states on instructions that the applicant may be permitted to withdraw this application. Accordingly this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (P.V.HARDAS,J)
KJ
State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
Mrs. Mridula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
