This court dismissed the Criminal Writ Petition, declining to interfere with the evidence stage of the criminal trial despite the complainant's absence. Affirmed that the matter proceeded in the lower court with judicial direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.109 OF 2012
Baburao Laxman Wagh & anr.
... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
... RESPONDENTS
Shri Y.V. Kakade, Advocate for applicants Mrs. R.K. Ladda, A.P.P. for State
CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED: 11th September, 2013.
PER COURT :
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.)
fmp/cwp109.12
Baburao Laxman Wagh & anr.
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
K.U. CHANDIWAL
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
