Single judge order where the learned counsel submitted that the underlying complaint was dismissed. The court accordingly disposed of the Writ Petition without costs.
The writ petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1069.13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1069 OF 2013
Ramesh s/o ShankarraoMane ..Petitioner
VERSUS Divisional Traffic Superintendent, M.S.R.T.C., Osmanabad and anr. ...Respondents
Shri A.T.Kanawade, advocate for the petitioner
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.
DATED : 7th FEBRUARY, 2013.
PER COURT : -
1] Shri Kanawade, learned counsel submits that subsequently the complaint (U.L.P.) itself is dismissed. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
dbm/wp1069.13
Ramesh s/o Shankarrao Mane
Divisional Traffic Superintendent, M.S.R.T.C., Osmanabad
anr.
S.V.Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court