Court directed that prayers in the civil application could not be considered in the pending writ petition. Applicants permitted to file separate proceedings. Civil application disposed.
Applicants at liberty to file separate proceedings for prayers in the civil application; application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 286.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 286 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10801 OF 2012
Versus
Shri R. D. Sanap, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri D. J. Chaudhari, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. Shri R. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 06TH FEBRUARY, 2013.
PER COURT :
. The prayers made in this civil application cannot be considered in the present writ petition. The applicants are at liberty to file such other proceedings for the said prayers as is permissible in law. The civil application is accordingly disposed of.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Feb. 13
Rangnath S/o Kishanrao Morale and others
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapura
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
