This criminal revision application was allowed upon a compromise filing indicating the cooperative credit society had recovered the amount and sought compounding. The pending appeals and judgment against the accused were set aside.
Appeals set aside and petitioner acquitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri. Revn. Appln. No. 3/11
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2011
Govind s/o. Baliram Wani
....Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents.
Mr. B.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant. Mr. G.R. Ingole, APP for State.
Mr. A.I. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 25th June, 2013.
ORDER :
is signed by one Lalit Narayan Thakkar. As per the record this person represented the Co-operative Credit Society, complainant in the Court of J.M.F.C. and also in the Sessions Court. Present petitioner was accused in the case filed for offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. He is convicted and sentenced for the aforesaid offence.
Cri. Revn. Appln. No. 3/11
2
[ T. V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision application should be allowed given the compounding of the offence by the cooperative credit society.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Govind s/o. Baliram Wani
The State of Maharashtra
T. V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
