The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed an application as withdrawn after counsel for the applicant stated instructions were received to file a revision in the Sessions Court instead of challenging the issuance of process there.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
criapln1019-13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1019/2013
Sitaram Khandu Patil & Ors .. Applicants V/s Shankar Rajaram Patil/Bagal .. Respondent
Shri B.K.Patil,Adv.for applicants. Shri S.B.Pulkundwar,APP for State. Shri H.D.Patil,Adv.for Respdt.
CORAM :T.V.NALAWADE,J.
DATE : 24TH JUNE, 2013.
ORAL ORDER :
Both sides are present. When the Court made query as to why issue process was not challenged in Sessions Court, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that on instructions, he wants to withdraw the proceedings for filling revision in Sessions Court. Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
[T.V.NALAWADE,J.]
umg/
Sitaram Khandu Patil & Ors
Shankar Rajaram Patil/Bagal
T.V. Nalawade, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
