The learned Counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw criminal revision application No. 184 of 2013. The application was allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crrrvn184.13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2013
VITTHAL DHONDIBA SURYAWANSHI
VERSUS
THE DIST. SUPDT. OF POLICE, BEED AND ORS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr.Hange Rajendra G. APP for Respondent State : Mr.S.R. Palnitkar.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. Dated: October 10, 2013
P.C.:
After having argued the matter for some time, the learned Counsel Mr. Hange, appearing on behalf of the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the application.
Application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed, as such.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
PLK/*
VITTHAL DHONDIBA SURYAWANSHI
THE DIST. SUPDT. OF POLICE, BEED AND ORS
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
