Review application against an order granting invalidity of caste was rejected for insufficient material despite references to validity granted to other family members, as no new grounds emerged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 176 OF 2012 IN WP/7381/2004 WITH CA/10408/2013 IN RA/176/2012 PRASHANT GANGADHAR MERGEWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH. AND ORS
Advocate for Applicant : Shri A.S.Golegaonkar AGP for Respondents 1 & 3 : Shri S.K.Tambe Advocate for Respondent 2 : Shri K.D.Bade Patil
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ. Dated: September 20, 2013
PER COURT :-
akl
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 176 OF 2012
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. )
akl
Prashant Gangadhar Mergewad
The State of Maharashtra
Committee
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
