Single para order granting leave to delete an offending word from the PIL petition; no substantive decision on merits.
Leave granted to delete offending word on page 9 of the petition memo immediately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL-91-12
1
kambli
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 91 OF 2012
Krishna Harischandra Rao & Ors. … Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
... Respondents.
Mr.Krishna H. Rao, the Petitioner No.1 in person. Mr.D.J.Khambatta, Advocate General with Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for the Respondent State.
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 7 March 2013
P.C.
Leave to delete the offending word on page 9 of the memo of the petition. Deletion to be made forthwith.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(ANOOP V MOHTA, J.)
1 of 1
Krishna Harischandra Rao & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Mohit S. Shah
Anoop V. Moha
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
