This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 2 PIL.101.2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.101 OF 2012
Moti Kandswami Mudliyar Petitioner versus
State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
Mr.Aniket Nikam with Mr.Nitin S. Panrkhe for Petitioner. Mr.Ashutosh Kumbhakoni with Mr.G.H.Keluskar for Respondent no.2.
Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Chandana Salgaokar for Respondents 4 and 5.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 16 April 2013
PC :
2 of 2 PIL.101.2012
(DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
MST
Moti Kandswami Mudliyar
State of Maharashtra
DR.D.V.CHANDRACHUD
A.A.SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
