This order admits a notice of motion filed to condone delay in filing a contempt petition. The court found no delay, relying on the affidavit details regarding subsequent meetings.
Condonation of delay in filing contempt petition dismissed (finding no delay).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
1/1
11-nmw-42.2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 42 OF 2013
IN
CONTEMPT PETITION (L) NO. 41 OF 2012
Dr. Rahul Rajkumar Jawanjal
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondents
Mr. M. Deshmukh i/by Mr. Uday Warunjikar for applicants.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATED : 22nd MARCH, 2013
P.C.
By this notice of motion, the petitioner seeks condonation of delay in filing contempt petition. Perusal of the affidavit in support shows that after the order was passed, there were meetings held on 14th July, 2011, 11th November, 2011. The present petition is filed on 9th May, 2012. There is no delay in filing the contempt Petition. Hence, notice of motion is accordingly disposed of.
Dr. Rahul Rajkumar Jawanjal
The State of Maharashtra
R.D. Dhanka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
