The applicant sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to disagreement over the nominee following the respondent's failure to agree or suggest a name.
Appointment of Mr. U. J. Makhija as sole arbitrator.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 .. 6-ARBAP-3/13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY .
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2013
BLUE STAR LTD.
... Applicant.
V/s.
HAMOM SHRIRAM COTTRELL PVT. LTD.
... Respondent.
Mr Gaurang Mehta for Applicant.
None for Respondent.
CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA J. DATED : MARCH 21, 2013.
P.C.
None appeared for the respondents though served.
and Conciliation Act, 1996, applicant seeks appointment of arbitrator in
terms of clause-20 of the Purchase Order annexed at Exhibit-C to the application.
August 2012. The respondents vide their Advocate's reply dated 7th September 2012 did not agree to the name suggested by the applicant and
1/2
Asmita
.. 2 .. 6-ARBAP-3/13
suggested another name. In view of the disagreement about the name of the arbitrator, the applicant filed this proceedings under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. There is no dispute that arbitration agreement exists.
disposed of. No order as to costs.
( R.D.DHANUKA, J.)
2/2
Asmita
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BLUE STAR LTD.
HAMOM SHRIRAM COTTRELL PVT. LTD.
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
