Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha v. Neo Pharma Pvt. Ltd. and 7 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 34 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION No. 3100 OF 2002
Kamgar Utkarasha Sabha. ..Applicant. In the Matter Between : Kamgar Utkarasha Sabha. ..Petitioner. Versus M/s. Neo-Pharma Pvt. Ltd & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr. Ramchandra Yadav i/b Legal Vizz for the Petitioner/ Applicant.
Mr. P.M.Palshikar for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6.
Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : April 9, 2013 .
P. C. :
- Heard. For the reasons stated in paragraph no.3
in the affidavit-in-support of notice of motion, notice of motion
is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Registry is directed to proceed further and place the writ petition on final hearing board in the week commencing from 29th April 2013.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shridharan R. Thaliya Parambil Owenr of Hotel TADKA-2 Vs the State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.
Juhu Alaknanda Co-Op. Hsg. Socl Ltd. Vs Executive Engineer and 3 Ors.
Shri Radhakrishnan N. Pillai and Ors. Vs M/S.Engineering Export Promotion Council
Pushpa Mulchandani Vs Samudra Mahal Premises Co-Operative Society Ltd.